|
ADULT INDUSTRY UPDATE
By: Lawrence G. Walters, Esq.
www.FreeSpeechLaw.com
The House Judiciary Committee sprang into action this
month by approving a bill designed to address the Supreme Court’s recent
decision striking down the virtual child pornography law, Ashcroft v.
Free Speech Coalition. The Committee approved a bill that would outlaw
computer images that were indistinguishable from actual photographs or
movies. The bill would also ban any images of prepubescent children
engaged in sexual activity, whether virtual or not. The bill shifts the
burden of proof to the defendant to show that the images in question were
entirely computer-generated and not an actual depiction of actual events.
Some lawmakers disagreed with the newest attempt to regulate virtual child
pornography: "I think this bill is the newest in a series of attempts
to do what the Supreme Court has said we repeatedly cannot do," said
New York Democrat Jerry Nadler. A similar bill was recently introduced in
the Senate by Sen. Jean Carnahan, D – MO. The bill recently passed the
House and now moves on to the Senate for approval.
The House Judiciary Committee also took up the
controversial issue of online gambling this month. The bill, introduced by
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), is entitled the "Combating Illegal
Gambling Reform and Modernization Act." After various stalled
attempts by Congress to outlaw Internet gambling by United States citizens
using offshore casino Websites, it now appears that Congress is ready to
act on the issue through Rep. Goodlatte’s bill. The House Judiciary
Committee approved several amendments to the bill, which would expand the
prohibitions to include bingo, games of chance and selling lottery tickets
online. The amendments even went so far as to eliminate exceptions for
charitable organizations. The bill now goes to the full House for further
action. Given the fact that many of the previous supporters of the Bill,
like the American Gaming Association, pulled out after once this latest
version was proposed, the Bill has little chance of actually becoming law.
However, adult Webmasters who utilize online casino affiliate programs
should closely follow this legislation since it may empower the government
to prohibit certain promotions such as banner ads for offshore casinos.
Score another one for the good guys! Based on First
Amendment grounds, a United States District Court panel of three judges in
Philadelphia struck down the Children’s Internet Protection Act
("CIPA"). This law represents the third attempt by Congress to
control online erotica, all of which have suffered defeats in the courts.
CIPA would have prevented public libraries from receiving federal funds
for technology unless the libraries installed filtering devices to prevent
access to adult materials. Filtering technology has been roundly
criticized as ineffective by Free Speech advocates. The judicial panel
found that significant portions of the CIPA law were "facially
invalid under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. On
June 20, 2002, the Government appealed to the United States Supreme Court
for review of the decision. How many defeats will it take before the
government gives up on its attempts to censor the Internet?
In a throwback to the McCarthy Era, the FBI will now be
allowed to investigate and conduct surveillance on innocent civilians,
including their online activities. The Bureau has canned the so-called
"Levy guidelines," which were drafted in the 60s and generally
prevented the FBI from spying on political and religious groups in the
absence of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Using the War on
Terrorism as a justification, however, Attorney General John Ashcroft
announced that FBI Agents will now be encouraged to visit public places
and conduct online surveillance of individuals and groups without any
evidence of criminal activity as a "preventative measure."
Internet privacy advocates have become alarmed by the new broad
surveillance powers seized by the FBI, and are concerned that cyber spying
will explode to new levels. Of great concern is the so-called "Magic
Lantern," believed to be the FBI’s latest and most guarded program
designed to let agents track Web browsing activity, including email and
password access, without detection. "It allows them to bug a computer
in ways that in the past they were not able to do," said David Sobel,
an analyst for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. For the record,
the FBI refuses to confirm or deny whether Magic Lantern exists. However,
according to Sobel: "It’s not someone’s paranoid fantasy, there
is the existence of such a thing."
Escort Websites have been the target of some recent
prosecutions in Florida. Officials with the Metropolitan Bureau of
Investigation arrested Charles S. Kelly, of Tampa, and Steve E. Lipson, of
Boca Raton on various counts of racketeering, deriving support from
prostitution, and promotion prostitution. Law enforcement officials set up
a fake Website to be included within the Defendants’ promotional portal.
As soon as the fake site was included, it received thousands of hits,
according to the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office. "The wave of
the future is really to do prostitution this way," said Assistant
Statewide Prosecutor Christopher Brown. The site had over fifty thousand
users, and advertised dates with porn stars for as much as $17,000 a
night. The owner of another Central Florida-based website,
www.bestadultclub.com, was also arrested on racketeering and prostitution
charges earlier this month. The website advertised a long-standing
gentlemen’s club in Cocoa, Florida. Based in part on information
contained on the site, law enforcement officials arrested the owner along
with numerous employees, and froze all the club’s assets. The owner has
retained the author’s firm to assist in defending the charges and to
investigate potential civil rights abuses committed during the
investigation and arrest. Given the recent proliferation of escort sites,
Webmasters should closely consult with their counsel regarding the
legality and method of operation of any such Website.
Jerry Falwell just can’t seem to catch a break in the
legal system. After the highly publicized loss to Larry Flynt and Hustler
magazine in the United States Supreme Court, you would think that
Falwell would have given up on the courts. However, Falwell decided to
file a claim against a Website that pokes fun at him and uses his name
without consent. Falwell filed the complaint with the World Intellectual
Property Organization, ("WIPO"), seeking a transfer of the
subject Website, www.JerryFalwell.com, based on alleged trademark and
other intellectual property violations. The three-member panel of WIPO
ruled that protections should be limited to personal names that have been
commercially exploited. No such commercial exploitation of Falwell’s
name occurred, and the panel rejected Falwell’s claim that he has a
common law trademark on his name. For his part, Falwell plans to appeal to
federal court.
On the lighter side, it seems that adult Websites are
the home page of choice for public officials in Chile. Government
officials have admitted that a civil servant’s addiction to online
erotica has caused all of the government’s computers to crash. The
computer failure lasted for two days and essentially ground government
operations to a halt. The Chilean government has now installed filtering
software and the responsible government official was sacked.
Finally, it appears that another photographer has been
arrested for taking pictures of young girls. Kenneth O’Brien, from
Oklahoma City, a graphic designer for fourteen years, allegedly took
illicit photographs of a fourteen-year-old girl. Instead of child
pornography, O’Brien has been accused of distributing obscene
material. And so it begins…
Lawrence G. Walters, Esquire is a partner with the
law firm of Weston, Garrou & DeWitt, with offices in Orlando, Los
Angeles and San Diego. Mr. Walters represents clients involved in all
aspects of adult media. The firm handles First Amendment cases nationwide,
and has been involved in significant Free Speech litigation before the
United States Supreme Court. All statements made in the above article are
matters of opinion only, and should not be considered legal advice. Please
consult your own attorney on specific legal matters. You can reach
Lawrence Walters at Larry@LawrenceWalters.com, www.FreeSpeechLaw.com or
AOL Screen Name: "Webattorney".
|